Tags: Dissertation In PsychologyLuxury Brand Marketing Case StudiesSoft Binding Thesis LondonValued Personal Possession-EssayCritical Thinking Skills Graphic OrganizersEssays Medical LawManagement Style EssayOlin Business School EssaysProblem Solving ProcessesReviving The Essay Gretchen Bernabei
This is the level of detail I usually go with in each paragraph.
The introduction should, of course, briefly lay out what your general argument will be during the essay without any language analysis or developed points.
One thing my teachers have emphatically told us not to do is state the obvious, e.g.
Poetry analysis, also sometimes referred to as a poetry review, is a reflection on a poem that involves analyzing the poetic instruments, discussing the language and the figures used by the author, as well as sharing one’s personal position on the poem.
When it comes to poetry analysis, one has to go beyond just reviewing the words and phrases used, but instead see the bigger picture, try to read between the lines, and understand what has driven the poet to use the words he or she used.
However, the permanence of violence, death and their effects is a point of disagreement between the two poets, as is the extent to which violent acts can paradoxically ‘give life.’ Once you’ve identified a similarity or a contrast between the poems in terms of language use, explain in detail how that different use of rhyme, structure etc.
contributes to the similar or different way in which the poets convey the theme in the title.Every point can be broken down into sub-points; here, they are: You can see here that every sub-point analyses the language used in a quotation from the text, explains the effect of the language used and links back to the question; this is kind of like the “point, evidence, explanation, link” thing you might have done in your GCSE, only more sophisticated, because now you’re making lots of sub-points and comparing two poems as well.The comparison is something you have to keep returning to in every paragraph so that you get your AO4 marks.This conclusion isn’t groundbreaking, but it does summarise my points and tie together the essay quite nicely.It wouldn’t have hurt for me to include a little more detail on the dichotomies that I mention. Unfortunately, the only 'poetry' I've done in Year 12 being Chaucer, I have little to contribute her, but I cannot wait to whip out the anthology in year 13 ... I've been PMed about it at least I guess that's the issue with index threads.Here are examples of a similarity and a contrast point (try to include fairly equal numbers of each, although arguing that there are more similarities or more contrasts is fine): “The Gun”, Feaver tells an almost joyful story of the experience of hunting, using the simile “your eyes gleam like when sex was fresh”, which draws a link between sexual pleasure and the pleasure of the violence involved in hunting.The words “gleam” and “fresh” both have the connotations of something new, of positive excitement, implying that carrying out a violent act involves a certain thrill and even a degree of happiness.Feaver uses a first-person pronoun in a similar way to Flynn in “The Gun”, but to quite a different effect.She writes “I join in the cooking”, using the ideas of “joining in” – implying cooperation – and “cooking”, which is often regarded as a social activity, to create a sense of community.In the above example, I explored different elements of word choice: the connotations of certain words and phrases, including what contexts they would usually be found in and the implications of those contexts for the tone of the poem, and also the phonology of the words (the sounds which make them up).Referring to the effects of both the sounds and the meanings of the word reinforces your point.