Critiquing A Literature Review

A literature review is a critical analysis of published sources, or literature, on a particular topic.It is an assessment of the literature and provides a summary, classification, comparison and evaluation.

Tags: Types Of Cause And Effect EssaysTed Bundy Research PaperCattle Business Plan TemplateHamlet Essay QuestionsIan Fleming Research PaperShakespeare Coursework Romeo And JulietWrite And EssayStructure Of A Narrative EssayI Need To Write A Essay About MyselfThesis In Reading Skills

At postgraduate level literature reviews can be incorporated into an article, a research report or thesis.

At undergraduate level literature reviews can be a separate stand alone assessment.

That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.

Next, the student described specifics about the research design, including the sample, instrumentation, and data analysis.

You will need to critically analyse each source for how they contribute to the themes you are researching.

Critiquing A Literature Review

A critique is a specific style of essay in which you identify, evaluate, and respond to an author's ideas, both positively and negatively. You are expected to engage with the article rather than just summarize it, by considering its content carefully, and from different angles.It could be from five sources at first year undergraduate level to more than fifty for a thesis. Keep a note of the publication title, date, authors’ names, page numbers and publishers. Each body paragraph should deal with a different theme that is relevant to your topic.You will need to synthesise several of your reviewed readings into each paragraph, so that there is a clear connection between the various sources.Ecological and population generalizability were discussed. The student spoke at length on threats to internal validity.Following the information on threats to internal validity, the student provided suggestions regarding how these threats could have been dealt with. Not only does the student know what the weakness of the study are, he provides ways the study could have been improved. Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. The first hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in overall leadership behaviors.204-205): A systematic review: A traditional or narrative review summarizes different primary studies from which conclusions may be drawn into a holistic interpretation supplemented by the author's own experience, theories, and/or models: Whereas a meta-analysis is a way of testing a hypothesis, a meta-synthesis attempts to integrate results from a number of different but inter-related qualitative studies.Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS 6301.That's why you'll see some fairly complex explanations in this paper on the data analysis but no information on the literature review. Within the sample, 118 (0.73) of the coaches were male, while 44 (0.27) were female.With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.


Comments Critiquing A Literature Review

The Latest from ©