Instead, he, too, used some of Schechter's recollections. Most likely, she does not want the American people to know the extent to which she internalized and assimilated the beliefs and methods of Saul Alinsky." In her memoir Living History (2003), Clinton mentioned the thesis only briefly, saying she had agreed with some of Alinsky's ideas but had not agreed with his belief that it was impossible to "change the system" from inside.Writing in their "Washington Merry-Go-Round" column, they surmised that the thesis's conclusion might be at variance with Clinton Administration policies, saying they had "discovered the subject of her thesis: a criticism of Lyndon B. The thesis was made available after the Clintons left the White House in 2001 by the Wellesley College archives.
Use the advanced search option to do a title and/or author search.
You can also search for the Local Collection Name "BC THESES." See our search tips for additional help.
Embargoes: The author may have requested an embargo, delaying the online availability of the dissertation or thesis.
If a dissertation is embargoed in Pro Quest and/or e [email protected], you will be able to see the author, title, and abstract, but not the full text.
Clinton researchers and political opponents sought it out, contending it contained evidence that Rodham had held strong far-left or socialist views.
David Brock was similarly unable to access the thesis for his book The Seduction of Hillary Rodham (1996), writing that it was "under lock and key". Community-based anti-poverty programs don't work." Clinton biographer Barbara Olson wrote in her 1999 book Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton that, "The contents of Hillary's thesis, and why she would want it hidden from public view, have long been the subject of intense interest.
The sophomore year should include The Study and Writing of History seminar.
Junior and Senior years should be used to complete the remaining requirements.
The thesis was sympathetic to Alinsky's critiques of government antipoverty programs, but criticized Alinsky's methods as largely ineffective, all the while describing Alinsky's personality as appealing. He vowed to 'rub raw the sores of discontent' and compel action through agitation.
The thesis sought to fit Alinsky into a line of American social activists, including Eugene V. Written in formal academic language, the thesis concluded that "[Alinsky's] power/conflict model is rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts" and that Alinsky's model had not expanded nationally due to "the anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict." A 2007 New York Times review of Rodham's thesis summarized her views as follows: "Ms. Alinsky's central critique of government antipoverty programs — that they tended to be too top-down and removed from the wishes of individuals. This, she believed, ran counter to the notion of change within the system.""Alinsky's conclusion that the 'ventilation' of hostilities is healthy in certain situations is valid, but across-the-board 'social catharsis' cannot be prescribed," she wrote.